Editorial method
How a Flyerfolio page goes from an official source to a published page, and which checks are done by people, code and automated review.
1. Sources
We work from official programme pages, terms and charts. A copy of each source page is saved with the date it was read, so later checks compare against the same text. Where no official page is found, the page says so and does not state the programme’s rules.
2. Drafting
Drafts, short titles and summaries are produced with automated language tools from those saved copies, following fixed page templates (glossary entry, step guide, comparison, programme hub). Drafts are not published as they come out.
3. Checks by code
- Quoted wording must match the saved source text.
- Every money amount on a public page must be on an approved list tied to its source; new amounts are held back.
- Calculators and comparison tables only use numbers from stored records with an official link, a check date and the exact quote. Language tools never fill numbers.
- Links, page addresses and anchors are checked on every release; old addresses are kept.
4. Independent review
A separate automated review compares the draft against the saved sources and reports unsupported or wrong statements. Pages are fixed or held until the findings are resolved. This review is automated: it is not a person checking every sentence, and a page’s label says which checks it had.
5. Publishing and updates
Pages are published in batches. Each page shows the date its facts were checked. News items keep the official announcement date, the effective date and any end date apart.
What we do not do
- No reader reviews, ratings or testimonials are published.
- No figures are estimated to fill a gap: a missing value is marked as not yet checked.
See also verification status and corrections.